[Salon] Sisi stunned by Trump’s imperial hubris



Sisi stunned by Trump’s imperial hubris

Summary: the US president’s continuing claim to Gaza as a piece of real estate ripe for development and his talk of ‘relocating’ the Strip’s nearly 2 million inhabitants is proving to be the greatest threat the Sisi regime has yet faced.

We thank our regular contributor Maged Mandour for today’s newsletter. Maged is a political analyst who also contributes to Middle East Eye and Open Democracy. He is a writer for Sada, the Carnegie Endowment online journal and the author of the recently published and highly recommended Egypt under El-Sisi (I.B.Tauris) which examines social and political developments since the coup of 2013. You can find Maged’s most recent AD podcast here.

It has only been a few weeks since Donald Trump took office and the jubilation felt in Cairo at his win has quickly subsided. President Abdel Fattah El- Sisi, Trump’s “favourite dictator” is now faced with the most serious direct threat to his regime and it is coming from a close and vital ally. On 26 January, Trump called for Gaza to be “cleaned out” of its inhabitants, by moving the Palestinians to Egypt and Jordan. It was a suggestion the president doubled down on during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where he also laid out a plan that would see the United States take over the strip, as part of its supposed clean up, saying that the Palestinians would go to live elsewhere and permanently. In effect, Trump adopted the most extreme vision of the Israeli right with Gaza ethnically cleansed. This proposal is not only extremely difficult to implement without mass genocidal violence against the Palestinians but it signals the likely dismantling of the regional order that came into place with the Camp David Accords. Furthermore, it is an existential threat to the Sisi regime running contrary to the raison d'etre and the founding narrative of the Free Officer’s Movement that overthrew King Farouk in 1952. Indeed, the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians is the gravest threat that the Egyptian national state in its current incarnation has faced since defeat in the 1967 war and it has no choice but to resist it.

The reasons for this are myriad, complex, and sometimes contradictory. In order to fully grasp the gravity of the Trump initiative one needs to understand the ideological genesis of the Free Officers Movement and its latest incarnation under Sisi. Anti-imperialism was a significant part of the ideological justification for the 1952 coup which ushered in the beginnings of the military establishment's overt political role. Israel was seen as a piece of an imperial Western design and hence the support for Palestinians became a potent ideological tool for providing legitimacy for the nascent regime.


The Chief of Staff of the Egyptian Army, Lieutenant General Ahmed Khalifa, inspecting the security situation and safety measures along the border with the Gaza Strip, September 5, 2024 [photo credit: Egypt MoD]

The 1973 Yom Kippur war and the Camp David accords that followed saw an evolution of this ideological framework wherein the separate peace with Israel was framed as a necessary requirement for Egypt’s economic development. However, support for the Palestinians remained a constant, at least at the rhetorical level. This continued even as relations with Israel continued to grow tighter, evolving into a close alliance by the time Sisi came to power. Hence, anti-imperialism as symbolised by support for the Palestinians remained an important ideological tenet buttressing the rationale for the national military state. It was later to be turned inwards against domestic opponents of the regime manifesting itself in a myriad of conspiracy theories that the military propagated to justify the coup in 2013. One such claim was that the Muslim Brotherhood had a plan to sell Sinai to the Palestinians for US$8 billion, financed by Qatar. It had the double whammy effect of accusing the Brotherhood of selling a part of the national territory and of colluding with Israel to facilitate the liquidation of the Palestinian cause.

There were other conspiracy theories that were even more fantastical, including references to a global plot involving the United States and other unnamed players which aimed to destroy the Egyptian State. These false narratives linked the Muslim Brotherhood and secular activists as internal agents for mysterious global powers being led by America. Fantastical though they were the narratives were useful in reviving deeply entrenched anti-imperialist sentiments to justify a tidal wave of popularly backed repression against the Egyptian opposition. They helped to cement a complex and contradictory relationship with Israel, where a close alliance evolved, while Hamas was accused of conducting terror attacks on Egyptian soil and the Egyptian opposition was accused of colluding with conspiratorial, regional and international powers working against the State. All of this was taking place while support for the Palestinian people remained the official position of the regime, albeit through the peace process and within the confines of the 1967 borders.

This complex and contradictory ideological edifice makes the idea of accepting a mass influx of Palestinians, against their will, the equivalent of ideological suicide. The entire justification for the existence of the regime, one can even argue the national state, collapses like a house of cards. This is what makes Trump’s remarks extremely dangerous for Sisi: it lays waste the justification for the Camp David Accords, which saw Egypt sidelined from the conflict, allowing Israel a free hand in its further colonisation of Palestinian land. Simply put, the regime will have no choice but to resist the influx of the Palestinians by any means necessary. Not out of support for the people of Gaza, whom it helped to siege for more than a decade, but because of its own need to survive. The cornerstone of Egypt's alliance with Israel, which mainly revolves around the survival of the Sisi regime, would be upended opening up an avenue of conflict between the two parties. Uncharted waters.

Trump’s policy, however, is not only dangerous to Egypt, but to the entire group of so called “moderate” Arab states. By adopting Israel’s wildest colonial fantasies as a matter of American policy, Trump is putting Israel’s ambitions above the security of these regimes. Destabilising Egypt and Jordan, the other country Trump has said should take Palestinians, could lead to a domino effect, cascading through the Gulf and reaching Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

The United States is not only an unreliable ally, it is effectively acting like a revisionist power in the region, deconstructing alliances with Arab states it has assiduously built over more than six decades. The policy of managing Palestinian national aspirations through the mirage of a never-ending peace process, aided and abetted by a collaborationist Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and the continued siege of Gaza is a thing of the past. Now, in Israeli eyes and with Trump’s apparent backing, is the time for unbridled colonial ambitions, supported by America’s military might. Should this wilfully reckless policy prevail then imperial hubris, Trump and Israel’s, will push the region into an abyss that will far exceed the turmoil of the Iraq war with consequences that will last for decades to come.

Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Arab Digest website


follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2025 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.